About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

40 Legal Reference Services Q. 113 (2021)
The Corruption of Copyright and Returning It to Its Original Purposes

handle is hein.journals/lgrefsq40 and id is 112 raw text is: LEGAL REFERENCE SERVICES QUARTERLY
2021, VOL. 40, NOS. 2-3, 113-156                                    Routledge
https://doi.org/10.1080/0270319X.2021.1966238                       Taylor & Francis Group
The Corruption of Copyright and Returning It to Its
Original Purposes
Michelle M. Wu*
Georgetown University School of Law, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
ABSTRACT                                                    KEYWORDS
Since its inception, Copyright has had two purposes: the private  copyright; licensing;
interest of the author in being paid for her work and the public  libraries
interest served by the dissemination of these works. Within
the last two decades, though, some industries have systemat-
ically undermined both of those interests, redirecting the
benefits of copyright towards themselves instead of the intended
beneficiaries. This paper looks at the book, music, and enter-
tainment industries, examines how copyright has been used to
suppress the uses it was intended to foster, and explores ongo-
ing and proposed avenues for course correction
Introduction
[the United States Congress shall have power] To promote the Progress of Science
and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclu-
sive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries.'
As enshrined in the Constitution, copyright in the United States has a
singular, animating purpose: to promote the progress of science and the
useful arts. To accomplish that objective, Congress was empowered to
establish a limited monopoly in the form of a term of protection during
which the author held certain exclusive rights, such as reproduction and
distribution, over that work. These two interests-that of the public and
of the author-serve as the backbone of copyright law.
Within the last two decades, though, some industries have systematically
undermined both of those interests, redirecting the benefits of copyright
toward themselves instead of the intended beneficiaries: creators and the
public. In examining how copyright has been flipped against its purposes,
this article will largely focus on book, movie, and music publishing, as
CONTACT Michelle M. Wu ® michelle.wu@law.georgetown.edu O Georgetown University School of Law,
Law Library, Washington, DC, USA.
'U.S. Const. art. I, § 8, cl. 8.
*The author is retired.
This article has been republished with minor changes. These changes do not impact the academic content of
the article.
© 2021 The Author(s). Published with license by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most